Is Giants' secondary improved?
New York needs to have injury luck and more production from D-line
The New York Giants' secondary took a step back in 2012 for a variety of reasons. A combination of inconsistent play, too many injuries, mental mistakes and -- perhaps worst of all -- a usually terrific pass rush that disappeared, forced the back end of this defense to hold up in coverage for too long. The Giants were near the bottom of the league in most pass defense categories and gave up an alarming number of big plays; by the end of the season they played with little confidence.
This offseason, the Giants lost a key veteran in free agency -- safety Kenny Phillips -- and did very little to add to this group. However, after watching a lot of film on this defense in the past week, the back end of this defense could be improved this season if a couple things go right for New York.
Let's examine why the secondary could be improved for the Giants:
It seems like this 4-3 defense has simplified its schemes under defensive coordinator Perry Fewell, and they will be very assignment-oriented. They prefer not to blitz a lot, with a real rush-four, drop-seven approach, and while they will play some combo coverages, they try to not put their defensive backs on an island in a lot of man coverages. We will see Cover 2 and Cover 3 looks, and the Giants really like to roll out their 4-2-5 "big nickel" package, which features three safeties. This look -- which takes a linebacker off the field and replaces him with a safety -- helps them athletically and in coverage, but could hurt their physicality versus the run.
If the Giants don't improve significantly from their lowly 33 sacks a year ago, it could force them to blitz more in order to apply pressure -- and that is not a good thing for this unit.
To read more about how the Giants can improve in the secondary this season, sign up for ESPN Insider today.
MORE NFL HEADLINES
- Steelers' Bell, Blount set to face pot charges
- Backup Manziel says he needs to earn way
- Packers fans declared NFL's best by Forbes
- Doctors: Jim Kelly has no evidence of cancer