A position to 'win' drafts
Did the Raiders waste their future on Carson Palmer? It doesn't just depend on the draft
There is no single method to having success through the NFL draft, no perfect philosophy. Go through the thousands of picks and hundreds of rounds and try to pull themes, and you can prove almost any case you want.
Total picks matter, you can claim. If you are a fan of the Green Bay Packers, you can argue that last year's success says a lot about the importance of accruing many picks -- a league-leading 68 over the last seven drafts. This strategy creates vast depth, the kind that makes a Super Bowl run possible even while the injured reserve is stuffed. And you'd be right.
Elite talent matters, you can argue. You could be a fan of the San Francisco 49ers or Detroit Lions, and point to the importance of adding elite talent. Both teams have experienced huge turnaround seasons after each adding two key first-round picks in the 2010 draft. Depth is nice, but you can't start 53 players.
The problem is that there are a multitude of counter-examples.
The Packers and New England Patriots prove that piling up picks matters, with two of the league's best winning percentages over the last six years. But the New Orleans Saints have the NFL's second-fewest picks in that span, and have played the best football in the history of the franchise, including a Super Bowl title. The New York Jets have made the fewest picks and have been to two straight AFC title games.
Adding elite, first-round talent matters, but what does that say for a team like the Washington Redskins, the ultimate example, who almost unbelievably had the second and third overall picks in the 2000 draft and proceeded to top .500 only once in the next six seasons?
You can't assess the draft by picks alone. Be it volume, board placement or scouting mentality, there isn't one foolproof strategy. The annual list of newly replaced GMs will all take the stand and say the same.
But there is a connection between the draft and clear success when you weave in another theme, and it shows why the Oakland Raiders haven't ruined their future by trading away so many picks for Carson Palmer, and the Cincinnati Bengals haven't assured their own success by adding them.
To read more about what really matters when drafting in the NFL, plus which teams are best set up for upcoming drafts, you must be an ESPN Insider.
-
ESPN The Magazine subscribers
-
Need more information?
SPONSORED HEADLINES
MORE NFL HEADLINES
- Report: NFL calls for immediate HGH testing
- Goodson legal issues predate recent arrest
- Pack's Rodgers: Urlacher favorite opponent
- Vick says he's still NFL's fastest quarterback
MOST SENT STORIES ON ESPN.COM
NFL WEEK 9 PREVIEW

HOT READ: Raiders CEO Amy Trask
PICKS
POWER RANKINGS
FINAL WORD
HOT BUTTON: Is Flacco elite?
JOHN CLAYTON/ADAM SCHEFTER
- Schefter's 10 Spot: Harbaugh erasing stigma
- Clayton's First and 10: Steelers vs. Ravens
- Schefter: Why Titans are sticking with CJ

- Clayton's mailbag: QB exceptions
MNF: Bears at Eagles, 8:30 ET
MORE COMMENTARY/BLOG POSTS
- Fox: Palmer ready to lead Raiders
- Williamson: Surging Chiefs are fighters
- Horton: Film reveals Steelers' Brady plan

- Millman: Week 9 NFL line moves
- Chadiha: Alex Smith's San Francisco rebirth
- Hensley: Whose defense is best?
- Sunday Countdown: Picks and more
SCOUTS INC./OUTSIDERS
- Outsiders: Why the Packers are overrated

- Scouts Inc.: Week 9 previews

- Rookie Watch: Dalton learning quickly
- Outsiders: The path to beating the Saints

NFL DRAFT
- Bowen: 5 second-year breakout candidates
- Sprow: Namath wrong, Smith pick smart
- Joyner: 5 fantasy breakout players
- Red Flags: NFC East | North | South | West
- Kiper: 2014 Big Board | Top TEs | OLBs | ILBs


