Top franchise tag targets
Identifying players on whom teams should -- or shouldn't -- use franchise tag
Each NFL offseason, fans enter free agency focused on what their teams can do to get better. But if there's one thing that can't be overstated when it comes to building a roster, it's the importance of retaining your own good players.
Ideally you re-sign them, but in a sport where careers are short, hometown discounts are largely avoided as players make the most of their peak earning years. It means teams need to use what leverage they have, and that is where the franchise tag comes in. The tag is a useful tool for holding onto a player for one more year and buying yourself some more time to negotiate or giving you the option of getting something out of him.
Let's take a look around the league at five players on whom teams should use the franchise tag, and five whom teams shouldn't.
Note: Salary cap numbers taken from www.overthecap.com
Tag them or else
Analysis: They don't have a lot of room for maneuvering here, so the idea would be signing a deal and then using that as a springboard for a longer-term deal, though that would hand the leverage to Monroe and his agents. Simply put, the Ravens can't let him get away because he means far too much to Joe Flacco. Monroe's time with the team last season earned him the seventh-highest pass-blocking grade of all left tackles, and Flacco saw his QB rating drop to a woeful 46.7 when pressured. It's not just about the player, but what he means to the team.
MORE NFL HEADLINES
- Sources: Bell, Blount to play despite charges
- Backup Manziel says he needs to earn way
- Cowboys' Holloman (neck) career in doubt
- Packers fans declared NFL's best by Forbes