Tagging Michael Vick was a mistake
Philadelphia Eagles quarterback likely won't play at last season's level
When NFL teams yank a free agent off the market by tagging him as their franchise player, they make what amounts to a financial trade-off. Without having to sign the player to a long-term contract or expose him to the open market, the organization can just about ensure that they will have that player on their roster for the upcoming season.
On the other hand, there's a tradeoff: namely, a boatload of cash. Franchise players get a salary equivalent to that of the average compensation of the top five players at their position or 120 percent of their previous salary, whichever is greater. That can be a pretty hefty raise. Michael Vick made about $4.5 million in 2010, but after receiving the exclusive rights franchise tag from the Philadelphia Eagles his 2011 compensation could hit $20 million -- guaranteed the moment he signs his tender.
We know that teams place the franchise tag on players for a variety of reasons, like gaining leverage in negotiating a potential long-term contract or ensuring the presence of a stopgap while a younger player develops. The uncertain future of the league's contractual system also plays a unique role this offseason. Even with all those options, there were still some curious choices for franchise tags this year. While nobody doubts the choice by the Indianapolis Colts to lock up Peyton Manning, we're going to examine some of those borderline choices by teams. We know they're paying top-five money, but are they really locking up top-five talent?
Michael Vick, Eagles
There were times in 2010 when Vick looked like one of the five best players in NFL history, let alone a top-five quarterback. And Andy Reid might have been run out of town if he had let Vick leave in free agency without acquiring any compensation in return. But when it comes to playing as a top-five quarterback in 2011, the odds -- and the numbers -- are against Vick.
To read the rest of Football Outsiders' analysis on the best and worst uses of the franchise tag this offseason, including why it wasn't wise for the Eagles to tag Michael Vick, you must be an ESPN Insider.
MORE NFL HEADLINES
- Cutler: 'Crossed my mind' Bears tenure over
- Sources: Bears 'confused' by coach's discipline
- Cowboys' Murray: Decision to play is mine
- Jags don 'I Can't Breathe' shirts for warmups
MOST SENT STORIES ON ESPN.COM
Insider on NFL
THE LATEST OFFSEASON CONTENT
Week of Apr. 18Apr. 24: Scouts Inc.: NFC West team needs
Apr. 23: Scouts Inc.: NFC South team profiles Apr. 22: Schefter: Browns should draft Jones
Apr. 21: Scouts Inc.: AFC North team needs
Apr. 20: McShay Mock Draft 6.0
Apr. 20: Scouts Inc.: AFC West team needs
Apr. 19: FBO: Teams benefitting from lockout
Apr. 19: Scouts Inc.: AFC East team needs
Apr. 18: Schefter: Who the Jets should draft
Week of Apr. 11
Week of Apr. 4Apr. 8: Schefter: Red flags surround Baldwin
Apr. 7: Joyner: Why Julio Jones tops A..J. Green
Apr. 6: Kiper: Mock Draft 4.0
Apr. 5: FBO: How pro days impact 40 times
Apr. 4: Schefter: Dalton could be a first-rounder
NFL Rumor Central
Get news and rumblings before anyone
Adam Schefter's Blog
Weekly mailbags on hot topics
NFL Draft Blog
A look towards April 2011
Your source for the 2011 NFL draft
NFL Mock Draft Central
The place to go for the latest mock drafts