Are you experienced?
Young roster isn't the problem -- Tar Heels' shortcomings are fundamental
The Inside the Bracket series takes you deeper inside what specific games mean to likely NCAA tournament teams or at least those we thought would be there. Today's example: the ACC rivalry between the North Carolina Tar Heels and the Duke Blue Devils.
When a team loses four starters to the draft, it's usually time to hit the reset button, even at an elite program like North Carolina.
But despite the departure of Tyler Hansbrough, Ty Lawson, Wayne Ellington (all first-rounders) and Danny Green to the NBA, Roy Williams was probably expecting much, much more out of the second-best recruiting class in the country.
Of Williams' five touted freshmen, only Dexter Strickland, Travis Wear and John Henson are averaging more than 10 minutes per game. But Henson, who was ranked as the No. 6 prospect in the 2009 class, just behind Kentucky's John Wall, is not even hitting the 20-minute mark.
In fact, only Strickland is being used on more than 20 percent of UNC's possessions, and what has Carolina fans even bluer is that the trio is combining with Leslie McDonald and David Wear to score just 19.0 points per game. All five have offensive ratings under 100, according to Ken Pomeroy's advanced metrics. By comparison, not a single Kansas starter has a rating less than 107.
In no small way, that underachievement has led to a 13-10 record and a 2-6 ACC start for the Tar Heels, which may have killed their NCAA tournament hopes.
You could add it all up to experience, or lack thereof. (UNC ranks 290th in experience among Division I teams, according to KenPom.com.) But inexperience alone isn't to blame in Chapel Hill. And experience by itself doesn't guarantee strong performances.
To see what's really tripping up the Heels and why experience hasn't proved either helpful or problematic for other NCAA teams, you must be an ESPN Insider.
Insider's Bracket Bundle
Insider helps college basketball fans stay on top of the NCAA tournament field as it forms.
Joe Lunardi: Behind the Bracket
Insiders get Bracketology details the rest of the public doesn't. See which teams and which games are impacting the bracket, why it's moving and what may happen next.
Lunardi's Tournament Odds/Rundown
Bracketology tells you only how the bracket looks on that day. Lunardi's odds tell you how it's likely to look come Selection Sunday.
See which bubble teams are bound to get bounced and which are likely to crack the field of 65.
Inside the Bracket
Hard-core analysis of squads set to endure the Madness of March.
See how the teams stack up in each region of Bracketology.