Originally Published: February 18, 2008

The best vs. most deserving debate rages on …

Share
Lunardi By Joe Lunardi
ESPN.com
Archive
Few, if any, Bracketology articles over the years have drawn the advanced level of feedback received since we posted our "34 best" versus "34 most deserving" piece a week ago. A couple of responses made our Friday mailbag, but I'd like to share a few more, and then ask committee chair Tom O'Connor and NCAA honcho Greg Shaheen if they'd like to comment.

Trust me, these guys and others have brought a new level of professionalism to the tournament selection process. I just happen to disagree on a small handful of their decisions, many of which come down to the "eye" test as opposed to what I call the "actuality" test.

To continue reading this article you must be an Insider