Few, if any, Bracketology articles over the years have drawn the advanced level of feedback received since we posted our "34 best" versus "34 most deserving" piece a week ago. A couple of responses made our Friday mailbag, but I'd like to share a few more, and then ask committee chair Tom O'Connor and NCAA honcho Greg Shaheen if they'd like to comment.
Trust me, these guys and others have brought a new level of professionalism to the tournament selection process. I just happen to disagree on a small handful of their decisions, many of which come down to the "eye" test as opposed to what I call the "actuality" test.
To continue reading this article you must be an Insider