Making an elite season-opening event is the answer
Originally Published: August 29, 2005
By
Jay Bilas | ESPN Insider
In an unprecedented move, the NCAA purchased the preseason and postseason NITs as part of a settlement of the NIT's antitrust litigation. Clearly, the NCAA saw significant risk going forward in the courtroom, where its past record has not been particularly good.
No matter how the NCAA came to the decision to buy the NIT, it is now up to the NCAA to administer those tournaments properly and in the best interests of the game.
I have been consistent in my opinion that the postseason NIT should go away. The postseason NIT used to be the daddy of postseason tournaments, with teams turning down NCAA Tournament bids to play in the NIT. Those days are long over.
To continue reading this article you must be an Insider
-
ESPN The Magazine subscribers
-
Need more information?
SPONSORED HEADLINES
MORE MEN'S COLLEGE BASKETBALL HEADLINES
- Coach K calls Team USA 'ultimate honor'
- Florida F Yeguete has surgery on right knee
- Elon joining Colonial in latest expansion move
- SF Pinson commits to play for in-state Heels
MOST SENT STORIES ON ESPN.COM
EDITORS' PICKS

- New League, Same Buzz
- Marquette has a new conference, but the same ol' Buzz. O'Neil »

- Midwest Musings
- At the watercooler to discuss Big Ten basketball. Convo »

- Big Ten Barometer
- Who is the key to Michigan's upcoming season? Medcalf »
- Insider: Indiana rebuilding or reloading?
- Rankin: What Pinson commit means for UNC
- Insider: Can Michigan win the Big Ten?
- Telep: Top 10 late-blooming recruits
- Insider: Marquette reloading with freshmen

