Likely tournament disappointments
Georgetown, Miami, Michigan too one-dimensional to go deep
Note: Calculations and statistics based on games through March 2.
The 2012 Missouri Tigers finished the season on a roll, winning the Big 12 postseason title and claiming a No. 2 seed in the NCAA tournament. Led by first-year coach Frank Haith, the Tigers overwhelmed opponents with the most productive offense in college basketball, scoring 1.21 points per possession.
We all know what happened next. Missouri lost to Norfolk State in its first tournament game. Although no one predicted the Tigers would lose to the MEAC champions, Haith's team suffered from a major flaw that made a title unlikely. The Tigers' defense allowed 1.00 points per possession on the season, and 156 Division I teams allowed fewer points per trip.
At TeamRankings.com, we project the likely NCAA tournament seeds for each team in the nation and the probability of each team winning it all. Our projections favor teams that amass large point differentials over the course of the year. One-dimensional teams such as the 2012 Tigers have a harder time racking up large point differentials, making them unlikely champions. And we could see something similar play out this season.
The following are three NCAA tournament-bound teams that have been ranked highly in the AP poll yet are likely to disappoint in the bracket. In all three cases, our models project shockingly low chances for an NCAA championship.
To read more about which high-ranking teams are bound to disappoint, become an Insider today.
We see that you are not an ESPN Insider. Upgrade today and gain access to our exclusive coverage.
MORE MEN'S COLLEGE BASKETBALL HEADLINES
- Selection committee to monitor Embiid injury
- UNC Wilmington fires Peterson after 4 seasons
- Florida, Wichita St. remain 1-2; UK falls out
- Delaware clinches 1st NCAA bid since 1999
MOST SENT STORIES ON ESPN.COM
Insider CBB content
• Greenberg/Telep: Kansas Jayhawks
• Greenberg/Finkelstein: Marquette
• Gasaway/Rankin: Indiana Hoosiers
• Gasaway/Rankin: Michigan Wolverines
• Gasaway/Rankin: Ohio State Buckeyes
• Greenberg/Finkelstein: Memphis Tigers
• Gasaway/Rankin: Florida Gators
• Greenberg/Telep: Kentucky Wildcats
• Gasaway/Finkelstein: Louisville Cardinals
• Gasaway/Finkelstein: Syracuse Orange
• Greenberg/Biancardi: NC State Wolfpack
• Biancardi/Gasaway: Duke Blue Devils
• Biancardi/Gasaway: North Carolina Tar Heels
• Biancardi/Gasaway: Arizona Wildcats
• Greenberg/Telep: UCLA Bruins
• Gasaway: Breakout second-year coaches
• Lunardi: Could Louisville repeat as champs?
• Greenberg: UVA tops list of surprise teams
• Fraschilla: How returning stars can improve
• Gasaway: Top title challengers to Kentucky
• Lunardi: Who will earn No. 1 seeds in 2014?
• Telep: Latest on No. 13 junior Theo Pinson
• Rankin: What Wiggins means for Kansas
• Biancardi: KU to prep Wiggins for NBA success
• Telep: Updated look at top recruits
• Roundtable: Most impressive on AAU circuit?
• Ford: NBA draft lottery preview
• Ford: Winners from the NBA draft combine
• Fraschilla: Burke the draft's top point guard?
• Ford: Measurements concern some GMs
• Ford: Why Wiggins would go No. 1 in 2013
Jay Bilas Blog
Jay's take on latest from around the nation
Analysis from Fraschilla, Greenberg and Lunardi
Get news and rumblings before anyone
Hollinger's College PER
College basketball's top players
Get wagering advice for every game