Updated: September 17, 2003, 9:37 AM ET
Should MVP award be changed?
With no obvious choice from among the contending teams, does Alex Rodriguez deserve the MVP?
- Great article Jim! This addresses my problem with the
MVP. Why don't they just vote for the best player all
the time? Why is it that the writers have to get all
intellectual and take the words Most Valuable Player
so literally? As for that, why does the Most Valuable
Player have to be interpreted as the player most
valuable to a winning team? If you are going to take
it so literally, you've got it wrong anyway. The
award is not called the Most Valuable Player to the
American League Pennant Race ... It is the American
League Most Valuable Player. Each league's Most
Valuable Player should simply be the most valuable
player in that league. Who was the most valuable
player in the American League this year? Here's your
simple litmus test: If you were creating a team for
one year and you were guaranteed 2003 production from
each player, who would be your first pick. That is
your MVP. We can have all the fun in the world
disagreeing on who that is, just as long as that is
how you made your decision. I don't want to hear that
Barry Bonds is the MVP because his team did so badly
without him and so well with him. Who's to say they
wouldn't have won an extra 6 games with Albert Pujols
out in left instead?
To continue reading this article you must be an Insider
