Modern Triple crown not an impossibility 

April, 29, 2010
04/29/10
2:11
PM ET

You can't believe what you hear in horse racing. Case in point, Bob Baffert, trainer of Kentucky Derby favorite Lookin at Lucky. After his horse drew the No. 1 position for the Derby, Baffert said, "He can't catch a break. ... Can we change the name?"

See, it's terrible to run from the rail; a horse can get caught in all kinds of traffic on the inside. In fact, only ... wait a sec ... actually, since 1900, 12 horses have won the Kentucky Derby from the No. 1 post, the MOST of any position.

Then there's this line you'll be hearing a lot of in the hours leading up to the Derby on Saturday: It's virtually impossible for a horse to win the Triple Crown these days. Today's thoroughbreds just can't take three races, at three different lengths (especially the mile-and-a-half long Belmont). After all, we haven't had a Triple Crown winner in 32 years.

Turns out, this conventional wisdom is also pure baloney.


To read why the Triple Crown hasn't actually become more difficult to accomplish in modern horse racing, you must be an ESPN Insider.

Peter Keating is a senior writer at ESPN The Magazine, where he covers investigative and statistical subjects. He started writing "The Biz," a column looking at sports business from the fan's point of view, in 1999. He also coordinates the Magazine's annual "Ultimate Standings" project, which ranks all pro franchises according to how much they give back to fans. His work on concussions in football has earned awards from the Deadline Club, the New York Press Club and the Center for the Study of Sport in Society.
Tags:

Insider

SPONSORED HEADLINES