Penn State Nittany Lions: Jim Phillips
The entire bowl business could soon have a dramatically different look.
Several conference commissioners, including the Big Ten's Jim Delany, publicly discussed the need to change the bowl business model earlier this month during the week of the national title game. Declining bowl attendance is a concern, as are issues such as ticket distribution and the selection of teams. The Big Ten's athletic directors will discuss the future of the bowls when they meet next month at league headquarters in Park Ridge, Ill. -- they'll tackle not just the who, what, where and when, but the how and the why.
Several Big Ten athletic directors we contacted talked about having a more "national" bowl lineup beginning in 2014. They might as well have substituted the word "flexible."
Right now, the Big Ten's bowl lineup contains heavy doses of SEC, Big 12, Florida, Texas and Jan. 1. The selection order is fairly rigid. As a result, we've seen teams go to the same bowl in consecutive seasons (i.e. Nebraska at the Capital One in 2012 and 2013) or to the same state for a number of years. Wisconsin played in six consecutive bowls in Florida from 2004-2009, including back-to-back appearances in both the Capital One and Champs Sports Bowls.
The repetition problem exists even outside conference bowl tie-ins. Ohio State went to Arizona four times in a five-year stretch, three times for Fiesta Bowls (one of which was the national championship) and once for the BCS title game.
"I used the term bowl fatigue," Ohio State AD Gene Smith told ESPN.com. "When you go back to the same place multiple times the novelty is lost."
The key to preventing bowl fatigue, several ADs say, is eliminating the rigidity of selections.
"We're going to try to get toward more looking at how do you put together a slate where you get good matchups, but at the same time avoid repeats the bowls don't want that either," Purdue's Morgan Burke said. "I don't know that we can unteach what people have learned over the years -- 'We have the next pick, and the next pick.' Maybe you don't do that this round. Maybe we say, 'You're going to get a Big Ten team, and it will be part of a selection process.'"
Delany has mentioned the possibility of collaborating with other leagues on bowl tie-ins, essentially sharing the spots depending on the year and the attractiveness of the matchup.
"This is about the fans and the fans' experience and us really listening to what they're saying," Northwestern athletic director Jim Phillips said. "It's been documented that repeat institutions and repeat bowls and repeat matchups is not a recipe for success. People want fresh and new and exciting matchups. Any way we can do that with those bowl tie-ins, I would be in complete favor of that."
The Big Ten hosted officials from 10-12 bowls last fall and will discuss possible tie-ins with the athletic directors throughout the spring. It's likely the Big Ten adds at least one new bowl on the East Coast -- the New Era Pinstripe Bowl at New York's Yankee Stadium certainly is in the mix -- and possibly another in California, where it currently makes only one postseason appearance (Rose Bowl).
Another huge component is ticket distribution. Many Big Ten schools struggled to sell their ticket allotments from the bowls this past year, as fans could spend much less for tickets -- often better seats -- in the secondary market.
"What we have to do is work with the bowls to take that impact off of the institutions but work closely together on a sales strategy," Smith said. "Let's forget about the institution being responsible for X, and the bowl being responsible for X and the local organizing committee being responsible for X. Look at your aggregator sales plan, then come up with a cooperative strategy to make sure we're selling the bowl out. We've just got to think differently than we have in the past, and think about pricing, and [tiers] of pricing and the venues and things of that nature."
The ADs are mindful of the upcoming playoff. Although they'll be tackling several important items in the coming months, the Big Ten's bowl lineup and the bowl system as a whole will merit close attention.
"The landscape is shifting with the 2014 playoff introduction," Barta said. "I want to make sure we keep the bowls relevant."
Northwestern and Penn State are among the top programs in the country when it comes to the NCAA's graduation success rate.
The latest graduation success rate scores were released on Thursday afternoon, and Northwestern is tied with Notre Dame for the highest rate in the FBS, at 97 percent. The Wildcats also led the nation in the latest academic progress rate (APR) scores that were released this summer.
"We continue to be proud of our student-athletes and the effort they put forth in the classroom that makes us a leader among our peers," Northwestern athletic director Jim Phillips said in a statement released by the school. "We are especially proud of our football program for once again leading the nation in graduation rate data."
Penn State is No. 7 among all FBS schools at 91 percent.
“We are extremely proud of the outstanding academic successes and graduation rates by Penn State student-athletes," Penn State athletic director Dave Joyner said. “Penn State student-athletes continue to compete at the highest level nationally and their dedicated efforts are producing record-setting graduation rates and conference and national titles.”
The GSR includes transfer students and student-athletes who leave in good academic standing, unlike the federal graduation rate, which does include transfers. The GSR measures graduation over a six-year period from initial enrollment; these latest figures are a four-year average for freshmen who entered school between fall 2002 and fall 2005.
The average rate in FBS football is 70 percent, up one percent from last year. Five Big Ten schools exceeded that national average.
Here are the graduation success rate numbers for the entire Big Ten:
Northwestern: 97 percent
Penn State: 91
Ohio State: 74
Michigan State: 64