#AskLoogs: Oregon's player development

January, 23, 2014
Want to ask ESPN RecruitingNation senior analyst Tom Luginbill a question about your team? Tweet it to @TomLuginbill using the hashtag #AskLoogs.

The answer, I believe, is twofold. First, schools don’t have to have top-10 recruiting classes to build a top-10 team, and second, player evaluation and development over time allows for prospects to be completely different two or three years removed from high school.

As far as Oregon is concerned, the most important thing it has been able to do is evaluate quarterbacks. If you hit on a quarterback or two, you give yourself a leg up on the competition. If you are signing quality top-20 or top-25 classes -- which Oregon does each year -- there is no reason why you shouldn’t be able to have a top 10-15 roster if you have evaluated the player and the person well and, once again, don’t miss on a quarterback. Oregon also has not had to play freshmen very much. Maybe a player or two here and there, but the Ducks have enjoyed the luxury of redshirting players, which can make a huge difference in the rate of development of players.



Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, photo & other personal information you make public on Facebook will appear with your comment, and may be used on ESPN's media platforms. Learn more.

Pac-12 Teams Can Load Up At WR
Recruiting reporter Erik McKinney joins ESPN's Phil Murphy to break down the deep West Region wide receiver class in 2016.