Buster Olney: Zack Greinke
This is a crazy game. If you had told me when I was growing up that I'd have at least six seasons of time in major league baseball, I'd have been absolutely ecstatic. While it was always a dream of mine to play, it also always seemed so far out of reach. Yet, here I am, blessed with so many things in my life, including a career that I truly enjoy. There are many other things, too: an amazing family (including the two friendliest dogs in existence), financial security and good health.
Good health -- something I'm thankful for every day. Something that not everyone in this life shares.
One of the most respected people in this game is in the fight of his life, and anyone -- everyone -- who has any part of this game is pulling for him. Players, coaches, general managers, owners, writers, umpires. Everyone.
As many of you know, Michael Weiner is currently serving as the executive director of the Major League Baseball Players Association -- our union. And anyone who follows the game also knows that a year ago, Michael was diagnosed with a Stage 4 glioblastoma, an aggressive and inoperable brain cancer.
I've been a player representative for the union since the start of the 2009 season. In the middle of that season, I got a phone call from Donald Fehr, informing me that he was retiring as executive director. After a few conference calls, we selected the obvious replacement that December: Michael Weiner. I hadn't yet met Michael. My agent, Rob Martin, had met him a few times and heard him speak a couple of times, so I asked what he was like. "The man is a human computer," he said. "He can probably quote you the entire basic agreement."
In my time getting to know Michael at various union events or even through casual phone calls, I can honestly say I have seen zero instances to dispute my agent's assessment. However, I can also honestly say that while his knowledge of the basic agreement and labor law in general is impressive, it isn't even close to his best asset.
His best feature is, far and away, who he is as a person. He's a devoted family man. He often speaks of his wife, Diane, and his three lovely daughters, and you can tell how much he cares for them. Furthermore, he genuinely cares about every single ballplayer. Never once has he started a conversation with me in which the first topic wasn't about how my family and I were doing. I'm guessing he's the same way with every other player. Those who've taken the time to get to know him know exactly what I'm talking about.
In my opinion, never has this been more evident than when dealing with our Joint Drug Agreement. Michael has listened to the players. We want the game clean. No more PEDs. Period. We want to be the era that, down the road, is widely accepted as the group of players who cleaned up baseball. We certainly want to punish those who are caught with something illegal in their system, even if it's not intentionally ingested with the mindset of gaining an edge on the field.
As for those who intentionally cheat? Ban them for a year. Or ban them for life. As for voiding their contracts, well, that time may be coming. Players are sick and tired of guys trying to beat the system, and at this point, we have no tolerance. We are tired of this being the focus of our sport, year after year. Baseball is an amazing game -- perfect in so many ways -- and we must keep the attention on the field, where it should be.
It has to be a tough spot for Michael to be in when it comes to this topic. He's supposed to represent all players and get the best possible outcome for them in every situation, right? No. Michael's response: "If they cheated, they should be punished -- I'm just here to help make sure they get a fair trial."
To me, that is someone who genuinely cares about our game and the way it's perceived publicly. We all leave a legacy in life, and he wants the game to be better when his time in the game is over than it was when he first got involved.
I recently had a casual conversation with an MLB general manager. We discussed Michael's medical situation, and he said something that really stuck out to me: "That guy is incredible. He's the best thing that's ever happened to this game."
And even if he said it in passing, I'm not sure he's far off.
Michael's legacy on this game has already been established. And whether he continues to build on it for the next 40 years, or if he's taken from this life sometime sooner, he continues to leave a mark on this game -- and on people's lives -- that won't ever be forgotten. It is an absolute privilege to work alongside you, Michael. And it's an even greater pleasure to call you my friend.
Notes and links (from Buster)
• Hanley Ramirez will try out his right shoulder on Sunday. Meanwhile, the Dodgers never lose: After Zack Greinke's strong effort Saturday, they've now won 36 of their last 44. The Rays pulled off a hidden-ball trick.
• The Braves' winning streak ended.
We had the Braves on "Sunday Night Baseball" the last two weekends, and our crew talked to Gonzalez about how he would structure his lineup down the stretch and into the playoffs. Gonzalez wasn't specific -- and he doesn't need to be -- but I walked away from those conversations convinced that his standards will be simple. He will play the best lineup he believes gives him the best chance of winning, regardless of contract size and track record. He reiterated that the Braves' collapse in 2011 changed the way he thinks, because now he's much more willing to make changes.
If B.J. Upton struggles early in September, he won't play as much in late September, I'd guess, and Schafer's presence gives Gonzalez an attractive alternative, especially against right-handed pitchers.
Brian McCann has a sore knee and was out of the lineup. The Braves' lead in the AL East gives Gonzalez the flexibility to liberally rest veterans such as McCann, and McCann has shown enough this season to demonstrate to teams that might be interested in him in the winter that he'll continue to be a productive player. He might be the most sought-after free agent of the winter, given that he could fit so many teams: Texas, Washington, the Yankees, Boston, San Francisco (with he and Buster Posey sharing catcher/first base duties), Philadelphia, the White Sox, etc.
Batting average: .363 (first, by 33 points)
Home runs: 35 (he trails Chris Davis, who has 42)
RBIs: 109 (tied for first with Davis)
• White Sox GM Rick Hahn and the players believe in Robin Ventura, writes Paul Sullivan.
• The Astros are on pace to finish 52-110, with a run differential of minus-242.
• The Rockies are collapsing, and it's open season on internal evaluations.
• The Phillies need to make a decision on Charlie Manuel, writes Bob Brookover.
In some parts of the Philadelphia organization, it's already taken as a fait accompli that Manuel and some staffers will be let go. But it'll be interesting to see if the logic used in the re-signing of Chase Utley -- he's an important part of the team's history, and he is still productive -- will be used in Manuel's case. Because if the Phillies don't believe Manuel is the best person for the job now, they should've already fired him, and if they think that like Utley, he can still do the job, they should extend him.
The tide has turned when it comes to MLB cheats, writes Tom Haudricourt.
Rodriguez is on a short leash with Yankees fans, writes Bob Klapisch.
• The ousted St. Louis radio duo of Jack Clark and Kevin Slaten are weighing their options.
• Ken Griffey Jr. was part of the ceremony in which he was inducted into the Mariners' Hall of Fame. He's a really complicated person.
And today will be better than yesterday.
Harper is perceived to have more power, Trout more speed. Trout is thought to have more range, Harper the better arm.
But it’s time that the conversation over the sport’s best young player be changed. It must include a third player -- the Orioles’ Manny Machado. In the year that Harper was drafted No. 1 overall, Machado was chosen two picks later, and the 20-year-old has continued to be overshadowed by Harper and Trout. He arrived in the big leagues a few months after the two last season, and hasn’t had the sort of attention that the other two have had.
This season, however, Machado has blossomed, hitting .315 in his first 65 games, with 34 extra-base hits (including 27 doubles) and 41 runs. Already, Machado is regarded as one of baseball’s best defenders on the left side of the infield.
I informally polled a bunch of talent evaluators around the sport about how they would rank the three players, and based on their answers, Machado already is viewed as a player comparable to the other two -- and there already is concern over Harper’s ability to stay healthy.
Total number of votes: 9. Points are based on 3-2-1 system. Here are the results:
To continue reading this article you must be an Insider
Evan Gattis has been destroying baseballs for the last calendar year, and it hasn't mattered whether he was playing in the minor leagues, winter ball or against the Philadelphia Phillies.
He is hitting everything, from a stance that seems very Barney Rubble-esque. Gattis is large, at about 6-foot-3 and 240 pounds, stands with a slightly open stance and a crouch and doesn't wear batting gloves. It's like he's swinging a sledgehammer, and from that setup, he has blasted everything on the inner half of the plate, such as this pitch against the Marlins on Wednesday night.
To continue reading this article you must be an Insider
1. The Los Angeles Dodgers are going to be an even bigger factor in the free-agent market than anybody anticipated. You figured they would be aggressive before the trade deadline and add some salary, and yes, they added Hanley Ramirez.
To continue reading this article you must be an Insider
But there will be a lot of interest in a former Cy Young Award winner who will turn 27 this week, a pitcher who has Greinke's command and potential for dominance.
Any team entering a conversation with the Royals about Greinke must know that a refusal to deal prospects would be off-limits. Kansas City would ask the New York Yankees for Jesus Montero and more, and the Boston Red Sox about Casey Kelly and more, and the Minnesota Twins about Aaron Hicks and more.
With that in mind, it's worth culling through the teams to determine which ones would be most likely to make up the Zack Greinke market:
A Greinke deal doesn't fit these teams:
1. The Tampa Bay Rays, who typically hoard their top prospects rather than trade them for more expensive players.
2. The Toronto Blue Jays, who have a lot of excellent young pitching and prospects but would immediately put themselves back into a Roy Halladay box -- getting a star who is moving toward possible free agency.
3. The Baltimore Orioles, who are still a couple of years from contending.
4. The Cleveland Indians, who don't have much money to spend and are rebuilding their stock of young pitching.
5. The Oakland Athletics, who have excellent pitching but have a glaring need for power.
6. The Seattle Mariners, who have an ace in Felix Hernandez and need major upgrades among their position players.
7. The San Diego Padres. Like the Rays, they won't give up their best young prospects to land an expensive veteran.
8. The Arizona Diamondbacks. They are restructuring, and their more glaring needs are in other spots.
9. The San Francisco Giants. Pitching is not a problem for them now. (Although it is fun to think about a rotation of Lincecum-Matt Cain-Jonathan Sanchez-Greinke, given that any Giants-Royals deal for Greinke almost certainly would have to include Madison Bumgarner.)
10. The Florida Marlins. They'd be paying about $20 million and then $26 million to Josh Johnson and Greinke in the next couple of years if they made a deal. That's not really their style.
11. The Houston Astros. They're going young, and it'd be tough for them to rip out the seedlings of their reconstruction and immediately trade them in an effort to win right away.
12. The Pittsburgh Pirates. They are where the Royals were in 2007-08, so it would make no sense for them to put guys like Pedro Alvarez and Andrew McCutchen on the table.
13. The Detroit Tigers. They've got an excellent young rotation in place, with Justin Verlander, Rick Porcello (who made great strides in the second half) and Max Scherzer, and Jacob Turner on the way. They have other needs.
Teams that might have the desire to land Greinke but not necessarily the caliber of prospects:
1. The Chicago White Sox. They are aggressive and big-time deal-makers, as we know, but rival executives who combed through their farm system before the July 31 trade deadline don't see a lot of talent in the White Sox cupboard.
2. The Washington Nationals. This is a team with two of the top young prospects in baseball, with Stephen Strasburg and Bryce Harper as well as an excellent young closer in Drew Storen. But unless they put those guys on the table -- and they almost certainly wouldn't part with Strasburg or Harper -- they might have a difficult time piecing together a deal suitable for Kansas City.
Teams that might have the desire to land Greinke but may or may not have what it takes to get him:
1. The New York Mets. With Johan Santana down for much of 2011, there wouldn't be a more perfect Band-Aid than Greinke. But the next Mets GM -- Sandy Alderson, perhaps -- will have to decide whether it would better in the big picture to swap prospects to make the team better now, or to wait. And although Ike Davis and other young Mets have shown promise, the Royals might look for other stuff, given their needs. For example, they already have a top young first-base prospect on the rise in Eric Hosmer.
2. The Milwaukee Brewers. Greinke would be a great complement for Yovani Gallardo, but like the Indians, the Brewers are in the midst of trying to rebuild their young pitching, and it's uncertain whether they would have enough to satisfy Kansas City's demands.
3. The Los Angeles Dodgers. They probably already shot their big bullet of the offseason, agreeing to terms with veteran lefty Ted Lilly, and their most attractive trade piece, Matt Kemp, might not look so good to the Royals. By the time Kansas City would be ready to contend, Kemp would be on the verge of free agency; the Royals will want prospects on the verge of breaking into the big leagues, not older guys.
4. The Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim. Rival evaluators love Angels prospect Mike Trout, who is regarded as one of the fastest players in baseball, and he'd be an interesting fit for the Royals in a possible Greinke conversation. But keep in mind that the Angels' needs are really about their position players; their rotation is not the problem.
Teams that have the need for Greinke and perhaps the desire -- and have the caliber of prospects necessary to get him (and these are listed in no particular order):
1. The Minnesota Twins. Greinke would be perfect for the Twins in so many ways -- he is the kind of front-line ace with the swing-and-miss stuff to match up against great lineups in October, and the Twins have the kind of market and clubhouse in which Greinke would fit neatly. The question would be whether the Twins would part with their best prospects to get Greinke; as Charley Walters writes, they rejected a proposal from Seattle for outfielder Aaron Hicks that would have netted them Cliff Lee. The circumstances would be a little different in a Greinke deal -- he has two full seasons before he's a free agent, he is younger and might be more open to an extension than Lee would have been. But the Twins' philosophy through the years has been to develop pitching from within; they'd have to paint outside those lines to make this happen.
2. The Colorado Rockies. They need an upgrade with their starting pitching, and they have a lot of good, young players.
3. The Philadelphia Phillies. GM Ruben Amaro has demonstrated he can go big-game hunting for pitching, having landed Cliff Lee, Roy Halladay and Roy Oswalt in the past 15 months. But he has expressed a concern about his thinning farm system, and it's hard to imagine the Phillies' making a deal for Greinke without including Domonic Brown and others. Like with the Giants, it's fun to think about how good they could be with a rotation of Halladay, Oswalt, Hamels and Greinke.
4 and 5: The Yankees and Red Sox. The first question that both teams would ask before seriously pursuing Greinke is how they think he would adapt to their high-pressure markets. Keep this in mind: The Yankees do have excellent catching prospects, and the Royals need catching, and even if they sign Cliff Lee, they would not hesitate to make a Greinke deal if they thought he could adjust to New York. GM Brian Cashman always has believed in shooting for high-end pitching.
A nightmare scenario for the rest of the AL: If Andy Pettitte retired and the Yankees signed Lee and made a Greinke deal, their rotation would look like this:
1. CC Sabathia
4. Phil Hughes
5. A.J. Burnett
6. The Atlanta Braves. But their focus might be more about outfield and infield help because they have good pitching already.
7. The Chicago Cubs. Who knows whether the Cubs would seriously consider doing something like this, but it's worth mentioning -- the Royals need a long-term solution at shortstop, and the Cubs have Starlin Castro.
8. The Cincinnati Reds. They have good prospects. They could use an anchor for their rotation. They'd probably be in the running, as they were for Lee.
9. The Texas Rangers. If they lose Lee, they'll be looking for a veteran starter like Greinke, and they have good young players to dangle.
10. The St. Louis Cardinals. They could offer Colby Rasmus, a nice starting point for any conversation between the Royals and Cardinals, but remember, the Cardinals are facing a major payroll crisis -- they already have committed huge dollars to Matt Holliday and need to pay Albert Pujols while keeping Adam Wainwright and Chris Carpenter; those four players alone might cost the Cardinals upwards of $70 million in 2012. Greinke's talent certainly fits, but his salary might not.
Because of the Cablevision-Fox dispute, the National League Championship Series was not broadcast in my area. Following the game on radio brought me back to a different time and place -- growing up in Vermont, our family didn't have any television -- with one major difference. As a kid, all I could hope for was a reverberating nighttime signal that tended to go in and out. Through the wonders of modern technology, I intermittently listened to all three radio broadcasts -- of the Phillies, ESPN and the Giants. In the midst of the Giants' two-run rally against Roy Halladay, the big right-hander didn't get a two-strike call his way. KNBR's Mike Krukow immediately sided with Halladay, saying he couldn't figure out why Halladay didn't get a strike-three call, and then he noted, after Pat Burrell followed that near miss with a run-scoring hit, how Halladay barked at home plate umpire Derryl Cousins as he backed up home plate. Great stuff.
Halladay said afterward that he thought the pitch was a strike, and given his personality, this is, for him, the equivalent of a million-man protest down I-90. Cody Ross got to Halladay, David Murphy writes. He has turned into The Babe, writes Tim Kawakami.
From our guys at ESPN Stats & Information: Through 2 1/3 innings on Saturday, Roy Halladay had allowed no hits. During the next three innings, two inside fastballs to former Marlin Cody Ross changed that. Ross hadn't been much of a threat hitting pitches inside, but in the playoffs, all that can change.
The Giants have four of the 11 wins they need for a victory parade, writes Henry Schulman. The Giants' hitters were aggressive against Halladay.
The Phillies' offense is a problem right now, writes Bob Ford. The hype didn't meet the expectations, writes Phil Sheridan.
Ryan Howard has been listening to the advice of a guy who hit a lot of homers.
Brian Sabean has found solutions for the Giants, Tyler Kepner writes.
Charlie Manuel's companion takes the ups and downs in stride, writes Mike Jensen.
The ALCSPhil Hughes had terrible command, as CC Sabathia had in Game 1, and after the Rangers hammered him for five runs in the first three innings, I thought for sure that Yankees manager Joe Girardi would get Hughes out quickly, setting him up to pitch Game 5 on three days' rest. After three innings, Hughes' pitch count was only 68, so he would've been properly rested for a Game 5; he got a little more extended, finishing with 88 pitches.
We could know more later Sunday about whether Sabathia is going to pitch Game 4, leaving Girardi to choose A.J. Burnett or somebody else for Game 5.
How Hughes got hammered, from Andrew Davis of ESPN Stats & Info:
A. He couldn't finish hitters off when getting to two strikes. The Rangers were 5-for-11 (four extra-base hits), the most two-strike hits Hughes has allowed in a start since Aug. 25.
B. Nine of the 10 Rangers hits went for extra bases, and four of the nine extra-base hits came with runners in scoring position.
C. Hughes left his pitches up, and the Rangers capitalized. Texas went 6-for-8 on pitches up, which ties for Hughes' most hits allowed in that zone this season.
D. The 55 pitches Hughes threw in the first two innings were his second-most in a start this season. At that point, The Rangers held a 3-0 lead.
From ESPN Stats & Info monster Mark Simon: Phil Hughes scored a 14 on the Bill James game score rating system. That's tied with Jim Perry (1970 Twins) and Fausto Carmona (2007 Indians) for the worst game score in ALCS history. In fact, it's tied for fourth-worst by any AL pitcher in any postseason game (tied with Perry, Carmona and Matt Clement of the 2005 Red Sox). It's the third-worst game score for a Yankees starting pitcher in the postseason, surpassed only by David Wells (2002 ALDS) and Chien-Ming Wang, who each scored a 12 (2007 ALDS Game 1). Both of those pitchers allowed eight runs in 4 2/3 innings of their respective games. Overall, it is tied for the 16th-worst game score, which puts it in the bottom 1 percent of the more than 2,500 postseason starts.
The script looked the same, but this time, Texas didn't flinch, Ben Shpigel writes. Joe Girardi should have started Andy Pettitte in Game 2, writes John Harper. The Rangers pulled off a double steal; on the broadcast, Ron Darling dropped the blame for the play right at the feet of catcher Jorge Posada.
The Yankees are essentially trailing this series, writes Mike Lupica. Just because Cliff Lee is starting Game 3 doesn't make it an automatic win for the Rangers, Derek Jeter says within this George King story.
Andy Pettitte gets the ball against Cliff Lee in Game 3, Harvey Araton writes. He's looking forward to it, as he tells Joel Sherman.
Colby Lewis was excellent, and the Rangers' bullpen -- a disaster area in Game 1 -- finished it off for Texas. The Rangers broke free of all playoff hexes, writes Jeff Wilson. Game 2 was a bullpen redemption tour for the Texas relievers, writes Jennifer Floyd Engel. The Rangers have beaten up on the front-line Yankees starters.
One bad night did not affect the Rangers, writes Kevin Sherrington.
Moves, deals and decisions
1. Tony La Russa said that Sandy Alderson is amazing, and endorsed him for the Mets' job.
2. There are a ton of managerial candidates, writes Nick Cafardo.
3. The Dodgers have an agreement in principle with left-handed Ted Lilly, whose agent, Larry O'Brien, had made it clear weeks ago that he thought a deal was on the horizon. Presumably, Lilly got something close to the $29.75 million deal that Randy Wolf signed with the Brewers this past offseason.
And this depletes the field of free-agent pitchers even more; it's a very thin class behind Cliff Lee.
4. John Henry has a new soccer team, and he's getting down to business.
5. About six weeks ago, the relationship between Tony La Russa and the Cardinals seemed to settle. So it's not a surprise that his return is almost certain. One of the lingering questions that will be of national interest is whether Mark McGwire will be retained as the team's hitting coach.
6. Terry Pluto gauges Shin-Soo Choo's value to the Indians.
7. Pat Listach will interview with the Brewers.
8. The Rays are looking at some very tough decisions this winter, writes Marc Topkin.
9. Pete Mackanin is being considered by the Jays.
From the mailbag
To continue reading this article you must be an Insider